STEP Inc - UTS Linfield

From: Notes on the History of the UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus, Fay Pettit (undated)

Early history

The land on which the Ku-ring-gai campus is situated had been privately owned until 1915 when the Commonwealth Government acquired it during the First World War for the Army’s use as a rifle range. It was acquired by NSW in 1961 ”for and on behalf of Her Most Gracious Majesty Queen Elizabeth II for the purposes of the Public Instruction Act of 1880".

The site was developed as William Balmain Teachers College and opened in 1971. Construction had been delayed by protests by local residents about destruction of bushland on the site and later, with the backing of Ku-ring-gai
Council, by protests about the problems of traffic in the narrow streets. The architect, David Turner, stated that his main design aim was to keep the college as compact as possible, “because the landscape was so wonderful it should not have been built on. When it was going ahead anyway, I thought I’d protect the environment all I could”.

In 1974, along with the other Teachers Colleges, William Balmain Teachers College officially closed. It then became Ku-ring-gai College of Advanced Education, a corporate body with its own council. It was no longer tied to the Education Department. However it did not own the campus land which remained vested in the Crown.

UTS acquisition and the access road and railway station imbroglio

After changes in the education system in Australia the campus became, on 1 January 1990, part of UTS. The new UTS campus land remained Crown land until they and the other universities involved finally acquired the titles which were issued on 1 December 1994 for a fee of $1. From FOI papers obtained it appears that title was only granted to UTS and the other universities on the
condition that the “site continues to be used for the same academic purposes".

In 1990, UTS lodged a development application with council for construction of an access road from Lady Game Drive through the environmentally sensitive College Creek area. A committee was formed and STEP's representative, who has a civil engineering background, proposed an alternative route through a less sensitive area. Over the years UTS submitted several revised development applications, as a result of very protracted negotiations, community
meetings and submissions involving the University, the Council, the National Parks and Wildlife Service, environmental groups and residents. Eventually in 1998 Council granted conditional Development Consent, demanding that UTS produced a much needed Bushland Management Plan for the Grounds.

However this never occurred and the Development Consent expired. The cause was the Parramatta to Chatswood railway link and the proposal for a station at UTS Lindfield, which would provide the additional access necessary and thus cancelled the need for an additional access road.

Unfortunately, the planning and review process for the rail link concluded that a station at UTS Linfield was not economically viable. UTS had prepared a forecast of an increase to 6600 students by 2006, however economic consultants for the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning indicated even an increase to 11,500 students would not make the construction financially viable.

Furthermore, the Environmental Impact Statement noted, "The UTS site is also located at the tip of a peninsula, with only one access point through surrounding residential streets, in a bush fire prone area. Some of the environmental planning issues associated with expansion of the campus on this site are able to be resolved, however the major concern of traffic and transport impacts on the adjacent area still needs to be addressed. The strong concerns and opposition of local councils and local residents over any proposed campus expansion is also a critical issue that needs to be noted".

Dilapidation of the campus

Since abandonment of the access road and railway station proposals, the university has been stating that the Lindfield campus is suffering because staff and students no longer want to go there. In June 2005, Fay Pettit was able to write:

"There have been a great many indications that for some time the Ku-ring-gai campus is being deliberately run down and its education function undermined.”

Fay went on the give nine examples including the exclusion of Lindfield from UTS Annual Reports, the withdrawal of lecturers, the closing down of the popular evening courses and the neglect of maintenance. The campus is now in a sad state of dilapidation: a state that one may conclude arose from theuniversity wanting it that way.

The Threat of Part 3A, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act

Go to: The Threat of Part 3A - introduction into the Act by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Infrastructure and Other Planning Reform) Act 2005.

Other resources